Maybe you’ve heard of the term False Flag before. Possibly in context with the U.S. involvement in Vietnam, vis-a-vis the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Or the 1933 burning of the Reichstag building which propelled the Nazi party into power over the Communists.
Or maybe you’ve even heard it associated with 9/11 and the destruction of all those buildings in New York.
Wikipedia’s definition for a False Flag:
“False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.
In its most modern usage, the term may also refer to those events which governments are cognizant of and able to stop but choose to allow to happen (or “stand down”), as a strategy to entangle or prepare the nation for war. Furthermore, the term “false flag terrorism” may even be used in those instances when violence is carried out by groups or organizations which, whether they know it or not, are being supported or controlled by the “victim” nation.”
And there you have by reason in the definition, the agenda for control.
There are many techniques in implementing this agenda, and many of them overlap. One such technique utilized by tyrants and social engineers is the Hegelian Dialectic.
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? Basically it’s a mind control technique used in directing the thoughts and actions of the population, or segments there of, to implement an agenda.
This process is structured under a format: A) thesis B) antithesis C) synthesis. David Icke gives a simpler description: A) problem B) reaction C) solution; e.g. A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.
What a concept.
In his presentations, Mark Passio describes the Hegelian Dialectic like this, “…the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflict that lead to a pre-determined solution. This is accomplished by manipulating consciousness into a circular pattern of thought and action. The synthetic solution to these conflicts can’t be introduced unless those being manipulated take a side that will advance the predetermined agenda.”
This perspective really broadens the concept for manipulation and when we ‘synthesize’ these two techniques for mind control, False Flags + Hegelian Dialectic = a mentally imprisoned population with no understanding of, or solutions for their dilemma.
Let’s take a modern day look at some (what should be considered) False Flag events where the Hegelian Dialectic is used most effectively:
Now, be aware next time someone in ‘authority’ gets on the TV and starts telling you what the problem is and how you should react to it. All the meanwhile generating consensus on the solution. Are these thoughts your own?
“Look, ISIS decapitated 3 journalists! We must stop them with our strategic bombing program. Who cares how many innocent lives are lost in the process!”
One must ask, what is the REAL agenda here?